Le cours comme <em>remake</em> de l’œuvre : Barthes au Collège de France
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Barthes présente Le Neutre, le cours qu'il dispense au Collège de France en 1978, comme « remake du Degré zéro de l'écriture », son premier livre. Durant la préparation de ce cours, Barthes note dans son carnet : « reprise obstinée de ce qui court dans l'oeuvre, depuis le D[egré] Z[éro] ». Reprise ou remake, ces termes invitent à étudier l'articulation auteur/professeur sous une modalité singulière. À considérer les liens entre Le Degré zéro et Le Neutre, mais aussi La Préparation du roman (son dernier cours), cette distance de soi à soi marque un recul du caractère assertif de l'expérience de la littérature. Pour Barthes, écrire après Le Degré zéro demande de « changer d'écriture », notamment en abandonnant l'objectivité du commentaire : c'est cette quête, menée par l'auteur depuis le lieu de son enseignement, que le présent article se propose de retracer.AbstractBarthes presents Le Neutre, the lecture he gave at Le Collège de France in 1978, as a « remake of Le Degré zéro de l'écriture », his first essay. While preparing this lecture, Barthes writes in his personal notebook: « obstinate resumption of an idea running throughout the work, since the D[egré] Z[éro] ». Resumption or remake: these words lead us to think about the articulation between author and professor in a singular modality. By considering the links between Le Degré zéro and Le Neutre, as La Préparation du roman (his last lecture), this distance Barthes takes from himself illustrates a less assertive experimentation of literature. According to Barthes, writing after Le Degré zéro requires to « change one's writing », especially by rejecting the objectivity of commentary. This paper proposes to explore this quest led by the author in his lectures at the Collège de France.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".