MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2196892417

장기 동물 실험 및 응급상황에서의 곡관형 좌심실보조장치의 생체적합성 평가

2014· article· ko· W2196892417 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
강성민, 허균, 최성욱

Bibliographic record

Venue大韓機械學會論文集. Transactions of the Korean society of mechanical engineers. B. B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInnovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabrador RetrieverMedicineSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

심장 질환 환자에게 약물 치료를 시행하고 있으나, 통상의 약물 치료만으로는 심장질환을 치료하기에는 부족하다. 그러나 LVAD 를 이식한다면 심장기능을 보조하여 심장 이식까지의 가교 역할로서 효과가 있다고 보고되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 선행 연구로 개발된 곡관형 LVAD 인 LibraHeart-I(LH-1)을 이용하여, 대동물(Bovine model, Holstein)과 소동물(canine model, Labrador-retriever)을 대상으로 장기간 동물실험 및 응급상황에서의 생체적합성을 평가하고자 한다. 대동물을 대상으로 실시한 장기간의 동물 실험에서 49 일 생존하였으며, 실험기간 동안 실시한 혈액 검사 및 생징후에서 특이 소견을 관찰되지 않았다. 소동물을 대상으로 한 단기간의 동물 실험에서는 외부 구동부의 동력 지원 없이도 LH-I 내에 혈액이 머무르지 않는 것으로 관찰되었다. 본 연구에서는 장기간 동물실험 및 응급상황에서의 박출 성능을 통해 선행 연구로 개발된 LH-I 의 생체적합성을 검증하였다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue大韓機械學會論文集. Transactions of the Korean society of mechanical engineers. B. BSame topicInnovation in Digital Healthcare SystemsFrench-language works237,207