MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2196892417

장기 동물 실험 및 응급상황에서의 곡관형 좌심실보조장치의 생체적합성 평가

2014· article· ko· W2196892417 on OpenAlex
강성민, 허균, 최성욱

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venue大韓機械學會論文集. Transactions of the Korean society of mechanical engineers. B. B · 2014
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInnovation in Digital Healthcare Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLabrador RetrieverMedicineSurgery
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

심장 질환 환자에게 약물 치료를 시행하고 있으나, 통상의 약물 치료만으로는 심장질환을 치료하기에는 부족하다. 그러나 LVAD 를 이식한다면 심장기능을 보조하여 심장 이식까지의 가교 역할로서 효과가 있다고 보고되고 있다. 본 연구에서는 선행 연구로 개발된 곡관형 LVAD 인 LibraHeart-I(LH-1)을 이용하여, 대동물(Bovine model, Holstein)과 소동물(canine model, Labrador-retriever)을 대상으로 장기간 동물실험 및 응급상황에서의 생체적합성을 평가하고자 한다. 대동물을 대상으로 실시한 장기간의 동물 실험에서 49 일 생존하였으며, 실험기간 동안 실시한 혈액 검사 및 생징후에서 특이 소견을 관찰되지 않았다. 소동물을 대상으로 한 단기간의 동물 실험에서는 외부 구동부의 동력 지원 없이도 LH-I 내에 혈액이 머무르지 않는 것으로 관찰되었다. 본 연구에서는 장기간 동물실험 및 응급상황에서의 박출 성능을 통해 선행 연구로 개발된 LH-I 의 생체적합성을 검증하였다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.966
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it