Efficient Fault-Tolerant Topology Reconfiguration Using a Maximum Flow Algorithm
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With an increasing number of processing elements (PEs) integrated on a single chip, fault-tolerant techniques are critical to ensure the reliability of such complex systems. In current reconfigurable architectures, redundant PEs are utilized for fault tolerance. In the presence of faulty PEs, the physical topologies of various chips may be different, so the concept of virtual topology from network embedding problem has been used to alleviate the burden for the operating systems. With limited hardware resources, how to reconfigure a system into the most effective virtual topology such that the maximum repair rate can be reached presents a significant challenge. In this article, a new approach using a maximum flow (MF) algorithm is proposed for an efficient topology reconfiguration in reconfigurable architectures. In this approach, topology reconfiguration is converted into a network flow problem by constructing a directed graph; the solution is then found by using the MF algorithm. This approach optimizes the use of spare PEs with minimal impacts on area, throughput, and delay, and thus it significantly improves the repair rate of faulty PEs. In addition, it achieves a polynomial reconfiguration time. Experimental results show that compared to previous methods, the MF approach increases the probability to repair faulty PEs by up to 50% using the same redundant resources. Compared to a fault-free system, the throughput only decreases by less than 2.5% and latency increases by less than 4%. To consider various types of PEs in a practical application, a cost factor is introduced into the MF algorithm. An enhanced approach using a minimum-cost MF algorithm is further shown to be efficient in the fault-tolerant reconfiguration of heterogeneous reconfigurable architectures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".