MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rhetoric and Social Epistemology

2014· reference-entry· en· W2197275125 on OpenAlexaff
Lorraine Code

Bibliographic record

VenueOxford University Press eBooks · 2014
Typereference-entry
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicRhetoric and Communication Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhetoricRhetorical questionSubjectivityEpistemologyLegitimacySocial epistemologySociologyPhilosophyPolitical scienceLinguisticsPoliticsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This chapter examines the place and effects of rhetoric in social epistemology, taking its point of entry from the rhetorical strategies implicit in Rachel Carson’s landmark book, Silent Spring, and showing how the assumptions of rhetorically neutral epistemology are contested in the new social epistemologies of the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. When place and epistemic subjectivity claim a constitutive part in hitherto dislocated inquiry, rhetorical strategies claim a new legitimacy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.780
Threshold uncertainty score0.914

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOxford University Press eBooksSame topicRhetoric and Communication StudiesFrench-language works237,207