MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2197298870

CANADIAN RESEARCH IN THE GLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY

2005· article· en· W2197298870 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Frise

Bibliographic record

VenueDS 35: Proceedings ICED 05, the 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia, 15.-18.08.2005 · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicQuality and Management Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive industryScope (computer science)BusinessSubsidiaryMandateProduction (economics)Quality (philosophy)Scale (ratio)Product (mathematics)Private sectorPublic sectorIndustrial organizationEngineeringEconomic growthMultinational corporationEconomicsFinanceEconomyPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As in all traditional automaking countries, Canada faces challenges in the global automotive sector. The major issues relate to demands for enhanced product quality, onroad and environmental performance coupled with pressures caused by production overcapacity, the need for flexible manufacturing and the emergence of low-cost countries. To meet these challenges, there has been a marked increase in the scope and scale of both public and private sector automotive research and development conducted in the country since 1996. The topics addressed in these initiatives all meet the needs of Canadian companies and the domestic subsidiaries of multinationals, each of which have a specific mandate within their organizations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.855
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0090.021
Science and technology studies0.0130.006
Scholarly communication0.0140.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.217
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDS 35: Proceedings ICED 05, the 15th International Conference on Engineering Design, Melbourne, Australia, 15.-18.08.2005Same topicQuality and Management SystemsFrench-language works237,207