The Relevance of Jazz History in the Twenty-First Century: Jazz Practice and Pedagogy in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite living in the shadow of the US, Canada has produced a number of major jazz innovators. Many jazz aficionados are often surprised to hear that some of the great names in jazz—including artists such as Oscar Peterson, Gil Evans, Kenny Wheeler, Maynard Ferguson, and Paul Bley—are in fact Canadians.2 Our jazz heritage must be preserved and taught so that our music students become aware of the significant contributions made by Canadians. As jazz emerged from New Orleans and began to move north in the early twentieth century, large Canadian cities located close to the border became stops for American touring ensembles. The first known jazz concert in Canada took place when the Creole Band from New Orleans performed in Winnipeg, Manitoba in 1914, as part of a Pantages Theatre tour. By the 1930s, jazz broadcasts from strong American radio signals and the new recordings flowing north from the United States, lifted jazz to new heights of musical popularity in Canada. The people were exposed to jazz and enthusiasm was building for this new rhythmic and improvised music.3
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".