New records of<i>Drosera tokaiensis</i>subsp.<i>hyugaensis</i>(Droseraceae) from Kochi Prefecture, Japan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drosera tokaiensis subsp. hyugaensis (3x), a hybrid between Drosera spatulata (4x) and Drosera rotundifolia (2x), was found in Kochi Prefecture, Japan. Results of PCR–RFLP analysis of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions of nuclear DNA showed that the hybrid individuals had the combined patterns of both parental species. Moreover, the chloroplast DNA of all hybrid individuals was identical to that of D. spatulata, suggesting that the hybrids were generated as a result of the transfer of pollen grains from D. rotundifolia to D. spatulata. Drosera tokaiensis subsp. hyugaensis was reported from Miyazaki and Kochi prefectures only. Drosera tokaiensis subsp. tokaiensis (6x), which is an allopolyploid species of D. tokaiensis subsp. hyugaensis, grows mainly in the Tokai and Kinki districts and is not distributed with D. tokaiensis subsp. hyugaensis in Miyazaki and Kochi prefectures. These findings indicate that the hybridization between D. spatulata and D. rotundifolia occurred independently and repeatedly in various areas of Japan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".