Silêncios em Liberdade Assistida: encontros entre artes de governar / Silences on Probation: encounters within the arts of governing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ResumoEste artigo procura problematizar silêncios que, por vezes, atravessam encontros entre técnicos do Centro de Referência Especializada da Assistência Social (Creas) de Vitória - ES, com adolescentes e famílias, em seus processos de cumprimento de medida socioeducativa em Liberdade Assistida. Busca situar como a LA se encontra numa encruzilhada de práticas históricas constituídas em relação à infância e a adolescência no Brasil, que se caracteriza pela luta pelo reconhecimento como sujeitos de direitos e, ao mesmo tempo, esbarra em práticas de proteção, criminalização e repressão. Com Foucault, se percorre o conceito de governamentalidade a fim de analisar a relação entre artes de governar a população, como jogo de conduzir a conduta dos outros, de agir sobre a ação dos outros. Debate-se também a relação de produção de informação pelos técnicos e seus silêncios ao acompanhar os adolescentes e suas famílias no cumprimento da Liberdade Assistida.Palavras-chave: Medida Socioeducativa; Liberdade Assistida; Governamentalidade. AbstractThis article problematizes silences that sometimes arise during probation rehabilitation compliance hearings between technicians of the Centro de Referência Especializada da Assistência Social [social assistance centre] in Vitória in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil, and adolescents and their families. We seek to locate probation within the crossroads of Brazilian historical practices related to childhood and adolescence in terms of a struggle for the recognition of subjects having rights, an effort hampered by protection, criminalization and prosecution. We invoke Foucault’s concept of governmentality to analyze the relation between the art of governing a population as a game between directing the conduct of others and acting on the actions of others. In addition, we analyze the relation of silence and the production of information by technicians while following their charges’ compliance with rehabilitation during probation.Keywords: Social-Educational Measure; Probation; Governmentality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.030 | 0.042 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.019 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".