MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2197454702 · doi:10.1093/imrn/rnv256

Smooth Billiards with a Large Weyl Remainder

2015· preprint· en· W2197454702 on OpenAlexaff
Suresh Eswarathasan, Iosif Polterovich, John A. Toth

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Mathematics Research Notices · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAnalytic Number Theory Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemainderMathematicsSingularityDynamical billiardsBoundary (topology)Mathematical analysisPure mathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We prove an estimate from below for the remainder in Weyl's law for smooth star-shaped planar domains admitting an appropriate one-parameter family of periodic billiard trajectories. Examples include ellipses and smooth domains of constant width. Our results confirm a prediction of P. Sarnak who proved a similar statement for surfaces without boundary. The proof is based on the analysis of the singularity in the wave trace, occurring at time |$T>0$| equal to the length of the closed trajectories belonging to the family. Such families of periodic orbits produce large singularities in the wave trace, which in turn imply estimates from below for the absolute value of the Weyl remainder averaged over a spectral window. We also obtain lower bounds for the error term in higher dimensions. In this case, the main contribution to the Weyl remainder typically comes from the singularity at zero of the wave trace. However, for certain domains, such as the Euclidean ball, the dimension of the family of periodic trajectories is large enough to dominate the contribution of the singularity at zero.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.523
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.274
GPT teacher head0.490
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Mathematics Research NoticesSame topicAnalytic Number Theory ResearchFrench-language works237,207