Streamwise Dynamics of a Tube Array Subjected to Two-Phase Cross-Flows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nuclear steam generator tubes in two-phase cross-flow may vibrate due to excitations that emanate from various sources. Of these excitation mechanisms, fluidelastic instability is the most dominant cause of tube failures in the short-term. These failures, other than leading to unscheduled plant shutdowns, may result in leakage of radioactive materials that may ultimately cause accidents and economic loss. Very limited work has been dedicated to investigating purely streamwise fluidelastic instability in tube arrays. However, recent observations of tube failure caused by streamwise or in-plane instability confirm the importance of streamwise fluidelastic instability analysis. In the present study, we present detailed dynamic cross-coupling force and phase measurement results for a central cluster of tubes in a rotated triangular tube array of Pitch-to-Diameter ratio (P/D)=1.5 subjected to air-water two-phase cross-flow, for homogeneous void fractions of 0% and 60%. The measured dynamic forces together with previously measured quasi-steady forces are necessary to estimate the time delay which is an important input for the quasi-steady fluidelastic instability model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".