MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2197706780

О развитии русской вокальной школы в Томске

2010· article· ru· W2197706780 on OpenAlex
Е. Е. Ланкина

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueВестник Томского государственного педагогического университета · 2010
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArts, Culture, and Music Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryFoundation (evidence)SociologyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article covers the history of foundation and development of Russian vocal school in the sphere of cultural life of Tomsk from last quarter of 19th century till our days. It shows a valuable contribution to the formation of Russian national vocal school by some talented specialists and considers perspectives of its evolution in the city of Tomsk. The article touches the problems of artistic and pedagogical activity of some remarkable singers. The consideration are based upon archive documents, researches and materials of interviews with witnesses of that events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0080.007
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0050.002
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it