Construcciones para una canonización: reflexiones sobre los lugares de memoria y de culto en honor a San Isidro Labrador
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: Este articulo, contextualizado en la villa de Madrid (Espana) en tiempos del monarca Felipe II (1556-1598), analiza algunos lugares de memoria y de culto en honor a San Isidro Labrador, el patron del lugar: la fuente, la ermita y su sepulcro. Sobre este, estudia ademas la exhibicion de su cuerpo incorrupto. Reflexiona sobre la importancia de esos espacios para promocionar su culto y generar una identidad religiosa en torno al santo en Madrid, que desde el ano 1561 era una villa de acogida que albergaba a la corte de forma estable. Y en la villa se concentraba un grupo numeroso y heterogeneo de forasteros, principalmente moriscos y cristianos, por cuya convivencia debia velar el ayuntamiento. Para estudiar todo ello, tras presentar un breve contexto sobre los milagros que la tradicion cuenta sobre San Isidro y sobre su canonizacion, se reflexiona sobre los lugares de memoria y de culto. Despues, se relatan ciertas gestiones municipales respecto a las obras materiales mencionadas que se construyeron o repararon en la villa en honor al santo, centrandose despues en las atenciones dadas al cuerpo incorrupto y en su exposicion publica Summary: This paper, framing its atmosphere in the town of Madrid (Spain) in times of King Phillip II (1556-1598), analyses some reminder and cult places in honour of the Holy Patron of the place, Saint Isidor the Peasant (San Isidro Labrador): the water source, his nearby Hermitage, and the burial place, regarding which mention is made of the exhibition of his incorrupt body. Thought is given to the importance of these spaces as a system of promoting his cult and generating a religious identity related to him in Madrid, which, since 1561 was an immigration town which housed the Court in a stable manner. The town concentrated a heterogeneous bundle of foreigners, mainly Moriscos and Christians, for whose convivial state the town Hall had to care. After an introduction on the context of the miracles tradition attributes to Saint Isidor and his canonisation, a thought is given to the memorial and cult places. Later on, mention is made of certain municipal arrangements regarding material works which were built, or repaired, in the town in honour of the Saint, mainly after special attention had been given to the Saint’s incorrupt body and its public exhibition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".