MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2197932059

Plant Introduction in India during Pre- and Post-CBD Periods–An Analysis

2006· article· en· W2197932059 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Vandana Tyagi, AK Singh, Nidhi Verma, Deep Chand, RV Singh, BS Dhillon

Bibliographic record

VenueIndian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGermplasmPlant quarantineQuarantineAgricultureGeographySocioeconomicsVeterinary medicineMedicineBiologyEcologyHorticultureEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis of the germplasm import into India before and after the adoption of Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) was undertaken with the objective of finding the impact of signing this legally binding instrument by contracting countries. Plant Genetic Resources are at NBPGR for research purpose, quarantine examination and onward transmission to the users. The records of such imports five years prior to the signing CBD (1988–92) and five years after CBD (1997–2001), with a gap of 1993–1996 as transit phase were analysed. The impact was studied separately for CGIAR centres national gene banks in different group of crops. An overall decrease of about 14.5% in introduction of germplasm was observed during post-CBD period. This decline has, however, not affected imports from CG centres. The decrease in introduction from National Gene Banks in different countries suggest a cautious approach for sharing of germplasm. Countries like USA, Germany, Canada, UK and Italy still remain the main supplier of germplasm to India.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndian Journal of Plant Genetic ResourcesSame topicCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringFrench-language works237,207