Electrical breakdown of polypropylene filled with natural clay as nanomaterial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study presents the breakdown behavior of polypropylene filled with a various concentrations of nano-size natural clay. The concentrations of natural clay by weight were 0 %, 2 %and 6 % in polypropylene. For different concentrations of natural clay each specimen was subjected to a sinusoidal voltage waveform at power frequency with a certain ramp rate to a level where a breakdown occurred. The rms voltage at the breakdown was considered as the breakdown voltage of the sample. The mean dielectric strength improved about 3.5 % for the nanocomposite with 2 % of natural clay concentration in the host polypropylene. However, the improvement on the mean dielectric strength of the nanocomposite with 6 %concentration of natural clay appeared to be little more than 1 % when compared with 2 % concentration of natural clay in the host. This implies that there exits an optimum concentration of nanosize natural clay in polypropylene. Also observed was the increase of the dielectric strength of the materials with the increase of the ramp rate of the applied voltage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".