Bibliographic record
Abstract
In 1954 the football association of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) became one of UEFA's founding members. With Germany divided, and Cold War tensions at their peak, football provided one of the few cultural outlets that consistently breached the Iron Curtain. East German clubs participated regularly in UEFA competitions. The national team entered the inaugural European Championship in 1960. GDR administrators and referees became respected figures within the European game. This paper examines the history of early East German involvement in European football competitions, and the tensions that surrounded the GDR's dialogue with the European football community. Analysing the experiences of players and spectators, it focuses on the East German game as a multi-layered site of cultural transfer. Allied to the Soviet Union, GDR football primarily looked east for inspiration and opponents. At the same time, it sought contacts with the West, home of Europe's best football teams, in order to raise standards and deepen socialist influence in ‘bourgeois’ international sports organisations. There were deep ambiguities to the GDR's position at the geographic centre of European football. These ambiguities reflected competing local, national, and international identities that persistently undercut East German communism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.010 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".