Applying the Holder Standard to Speech That Provides Material Support to Terrorism in United States V. Mehanna
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In April 2012, Tarek Mehanna was convicted and sentenced to seventeen and a half years federal prison for providing to al-Qaeda. (1) During his trial, the prosecution alleged that Mehanna traveled to Yemen an unsuccessful attempt to receive terrorist training, (2) and that he translated al-Qaeda propaganda materials into English for a jihadist website. (3) In the national media storm following the trial, Mehanna's supporters argued that he was persecuted for exercising his First Amendment rights. (4) The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) warned that if the verdict is not overturned, people--including writers and journalists, academic researchers, translators, and even ordinary web surfers--could be prosecuted for researching or translating controversial and unpopular ideas. (5) Yet Mehanna's conviction does not present the grave danger to First Amendment rights that his supporters claim. This issue had already been settled by a previous Supreme Court case. In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, (6) the Supreme Court drew a hard line between independent advocacy, which is protected under the First Amendment, and speech that provides material support in coordination a terrorist organization, which is not protected. (7) As the evidence at trial made clear, Mehanna's behavior fell into the latter category. The First Amendment protects those who express unpopular views, but it does not grant Mehanna the right to serve as an agent al-Qaeda's criminal enterprise. Tarek Mehanna, an American-born Muslim, grew up Sudbury, Massachusetts. (8) Following the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq 2003, Mehanna became increasingly opposed to the American presence the Middle East and began to advocate for the violent expulsion of American forces from Iraq. (9) At first, Mehanna limited his activities to posting on jihadist websites. (10) In early 2004, however, Mehanna traveled to Yemen with Ahmad Abousamra and another American Muslim whom he had met online. (11) They spent two weeks together Yemen, crossing the desert an effort to find mujahideen fighters that had settled there after leaving Afghanistan. (12) The government alleged that they were searching for terrorist training camps that would provide them with the training they needed to fight against the American forces Iraq. (13) Ultimately, however, their trip ended disappointment. They found no terrorist training camps. (14) When they finally did manage to meet one of the mujahideen fighters from Afghanistan, he told them all of the camps had been closed down after the September 11th attacks. (15) After their trip to Yemen, Abousamra continued on to Iraq to join the fight against American forces there. (16) Mehanna returned home to Massachusetts, but he was detained upon arrival for questioning by Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. (17) Mehanna told them that he and Abousamra had gone to Yemen to visit Islamic schools, and that Abousamra had decided to stay behind Yemen. (18) The government alleged at trial that Mehanna knew Abousamra had gone to Iraq to fight against American forces. (19) Following his trip to Yemen, Mehanna continued to post on jihadist websites. (20) He also began translating videos and written materials from Arabic into English for a website called (21) At trial, two expert witnesses disagreed about the relationship between al-Qaeda and Tibyan Publications. One of the experts, Evan Kohlmann, testified that al-Qaeda's media wing directly coordinated with Tibyan. (22) Kohlmann testified that al-Qaeda would provide propaganda materials to Tibyan before al-Qaeda released the materials on other sites, so that Tibyan would be able to translate the materials into different languages before they were released to the public. (23) Dr. Marc Sageman, the other expert, testified that al-Qaeda piggybacked on sites like Tibyan by posting propaganda materials Arabic on multiple jihadist websites, but he disagreed that al-Qaeda used Tibyan as a recruiting tool. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it