MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

OS11W0019 Fatigue damage development and growth in fiber reinforced polymeric composites

2003· article· en· W2198336060 on OpenAlexaff
Fernand Ellyin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Abstracts of ATEM International Conference on Advanced Technology in Experimental Mechanics Asian Conference on Experimental Mechanics · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceQuasistatic processComposite materialDelamination (geology)StiffnessQuasistatic loadingCrackingStress (linguistics)Transverse planeCyclic stressStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Damage initiation and growth under quasi-static and cyclic loading of cross-ply and multidirection laminates are presented. Damage states such as initiation of matrix cracking, onset of delamination and fiber fracture are identified. A linear relationship is found between the maximum applied cyclic stress and logarithm of number of cycles for each damage mode. The effect of transverse cracks on the stiffness reduction has been quantified. Again a linear relationship between the normalized stiffness and crack density is shown to be a good representation of the test data, irrespective of the applied maximum cyclic load. Under cyclic loading matrix cracks initiated at a lower stress compared to the quasi-static loading. Also higher crack densities were observed under cyclic loading than that of quasistatic one. A major difference between the two types of loading is in the initiation and growth of delamination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Abstracts of ATEM International Conference on Advanced Technology in Experimental Mechanics Asian Conference on Experimental MechanicsSame topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207