MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2198794209 · doi:10.1016/j.bpsc.2015.10.003

Sex and Diagnosis-Specific Associations Between DNA Methylation of the Oxytocin Receptor Gene With Emotion Processing and Temporal-Limbic and Prefrontal Brain Volumes in Psychotic Disorders

2015· article· en· W2198794209 on OpenAlexaff
Leah H. Rubin, Jessica J. Connelly, James L. Reilly, C. Sue Carter, Lauren L. Drogos, Hossein Pournajafi‐Nazarloo, Anthony C. Ruocco, Sarah Keedy, Ian Matthew, Neeraj Tandon, Godfrey D. Pearlson, Brett A. Clementz, Carol A. Tamminga, Elliot S. Gershon, Matcheri S. Keshavan, Jeffrey R. Bishop, John A. Sweeney

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Calgary
FundersAstellas PharmaSunovionNational Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and DepressionGlaxoSmithKlineBrain Research FoundationEli Lilly and CompanyNational Institute of Mental HealthFetzer InstituteEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentBrain and Behavior Research Foundation
KeywordsOxytocin receptorSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)PsychologyEpigeneticsDNA methylationBipolar disorderPrefrontal cortexCognitionSocial cognitionOxytocinClinical psychologyNeurosciencePsychiatryGeneticsGeneBiologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations72
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBiological Psychiatry Cognitive Neuroscience and NeuroimagingSame topicEpigenetics and DNA MethylationFrench-language works237,207