MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2199000391

BRIDGES REQUIRE TLC

2002· article· en· W2199000391 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T Judge

Bibliographic record

VenueRailway track and structures · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)Track (disk drive)EngineeringWork (physics)Transport engineeringSpan (engineering)Civil engineeringForensic engineeringEnvironmental scienceMechanical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two recent railroad bridge projects show how special care needs to be taken to ensure they perform safely and up to standards for a long time. The first is the repair of a swing span bridge built over the Mississippi in 1901 and now part of Canadian Pacific. Years of short- term solutions had caused major decay in critical components brought on by constant pressure from river currents and increased traffic loads. The span needed to be jacked up and re-aligned before components were replaced and concrete work done on its supports. A new bridge for the AirTrain, the light-rail system at JFK International, is using state of the art materials to make it resistant to weather and temperature changes. It includes 10 passenger stations served by 32 AirTrain vehicles on 8.4 miles of track.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.729

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRailway track and structuresSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207