MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2199350001

Foreword: Gender Justice in the Americas: A Transnational Dialogue on Violence, Sexuality, Reproduction, and Human Rights

2011· article· en· W2199350001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alma Beltrán y Puga, Caroline Bettinger-López, Jorge Contesse, Paola Garcia-Rey, Diana Hortsch, Risa E. Kaufman, Nicole Tuszynski

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHuman Rights and Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman rightsHuman sexualityPolitical scienceLatin AmericansDomestic violenceEconomic JusticeGender studiesDignityMiamiInternational human rights lawReproductive rightsLegislatureSociologyLawReproductive healthPoison controlSuicide prevention
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In February 2011, 110 advocates and scholars from 20 countries in North and South America gathered at the University of Miami in Miami, Florida to attend a groundbreaking convening, Gender Justice in the Americas: A Transnational Dialogue on Violence, Sexuality, Reproduction, and Human Rights. The convening arose at a unique historical moment. In recent years, we have witnessed significant shifts in the normative and policy landscape concerning issues of gender, sexuality, violence against women, and human rights at the national, regional and international levels. Legislative and executive bodies, domestic courts, and international tribunals have, in several instances, made tremendous progress in recognizing new protections in these areas; and in other instances, these entities have rolled back established protections. As the convening’s co-organizers, we hoped that this timely gathering would expose participants to these developments, and foster a strategic exchange of information to advance advocacy at the domestic and international levels. We intended to assess common threats, and to create opportunities for coalition and movement-building amongst key women’s rights, gender, and sexuality advocates and scholars in the Americas. Specifically, we hoped the convening would stimulate interest in the use of the international human rights framework as a tool for gender, sexuality, and women’s rights advocacy in the United States and Canada (where human rights principles and rhetoric are invoked less often than in Latin America) and to reflect on the potential for domestic impact litigation in the Caribbean and Latin America (where such litigation is less familiar than in the United States and Canada). We also sought to facilitate participants’ reexamination of the roots of women’s rights and gender justice movements globally and recognition of the fundamental links between gender-based violence, reproductive justice, discrimination, sexuality, and health - links that are underscored when one brings a human rights lens to the inquiry. We hoped the convening could help to bridge our geographic, linguistic, conceptual, and professional divides and foster the development of a new “Gender Justice Network” of advocates and scholars spanning the Western hemisphere. This Foreword attempts to capture the essence of the Convening and the keynote speeches, articles, and essays that were published in a Special Convening Edition of the Miami Law Review (65 U. Miami L. Rev. (Spring 2011)).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicHuman Rights and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207