MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2199440216 · doi:10.1142/s0218271817501401

Universality of small black hole instability in AdS/CFT

2017· preprint· en· W2199440216 on OpenAlexafffund
Alex Buchel

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Modern Physics D · 2017
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicBlack Holes and Theoretical Physics
Canadian institutionsPerimeter InstituteWestern University
FundersInstitut Périmètre de physique théoriqueIndustry CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsDual polyhedronInstabilitySupergravityMathematical physicsConformal mapUniversality (dynamical systems)Black hole (networking)Eigenvalues and eigenvectorsLambdaGravitationQuantum mechanicsSupersymmetryGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Formula: see text] Type IIb supergravity compactifications on five-dimensional Einstein manifolds [Formula: see text] realize holographic duals to four-dimensional conformal field theories. Black holes in such geometries are dual to thermal states in these CFTs. When black holes become sufficiently small in (global) [Formula: see text], they are expected to suffer Gregory–Laflamme instability with respect to localization on [Formula: see text]. Previously, the instability was demonstrated for gravitational dual of [Formula: see text] SYM, where [Formula: see text]. We extend stability analysis to arbitrary [Formula: see text]. We point out that the quasinormal mode equation governing the instabilities is universal. The precise onset of the instability is [Formula: see text]-sensitive, as it is governed by the lowest nonvanishing eigenvalue [Formula: see text] of its Laplacian.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Modern Physics DSame topicBlack Holes and Theoretical PhysicsFrench-language works237,207