Oxygen diffusion and consumption of aortic valve cusps
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To maintain tissue oxygenation, normal aortic valves contain a vascular bed where tissue thickness is greatest. Avascular "living" tissue-engineered heart valves have been proposed, yet little information exists regarding the magnitude of valve tissue metabolic activity or oxygen requirements. We therefore set out to measure the oxygen diffusivity (DO(2)) and oxygen consumption (VO(2)) of seven porcine aortic valve cusps in vitro at 37 degrees C using a chamber with a Clark oxygen sensor. Mean DO(2) and VO(2) were 1.06 x 10(-5) cm(2)/s and 3.05 x 10(-5) x ml O(2). ml tissue(-1) x s(-1), respectively. When modeled as a three-layered structure by using these values and a boundary condition of 100 mmHg at both surfaces, the average aortic cusp predicted a central mean PO(2) of 27 mmHg (range of 0-50 mmHg). The DO(2) value obtained was similar to that found for other vascular structures, but because our studies were carried out in vitro, the VO(2) measurements may be lower than that required by the functioning valves. These values provide an initial understanding of the oxygen supply possible from the cusp surfaces and the oxygen needs of the tissue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".