Rejecting the Margins of Difference: Strategies of Resistance in the Documentary Films of Pratibha Parmar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In both form and content the films of Pratibha Parmar have consistently broken with film tradition. Primarily a maker of documentaries, Parmar goes beyond conventional genre structuring in terms of employment of technique, and pushes beyond traditionally acceptable territories in her selection of subject material. She works to create a form of visual resistance to standard definitions and identifications of community, race, sexuality and feminism, and to promote a way of thinking about self and social relations that pushes beyond the boundaries of fear, nationalism and protectionism. Parmar does not work to bring individuals and communities considered marginalized, or excluded, into the center, or mainstream, of society and culture. Rather, through deliberately feminist, and non-traditionally artistic approaches to filmmaking, she works to bring the center, or mainstream, out to the margins. Her films project and discuss controversial cultural issues that cross boundaries of territory and identity, and draw together viewers from different sectors of society to create new communities of audience and to challenge their understanding of each other.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.019 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.018 | 0.027 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.010 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".