MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2199977724 · doi:10.1249/jes.0000000000000071

Exercise Plus Metformin in the Fight Against Diabetes

2015· review· en· W2199977724 on OpenAlexaffabout
Normand G. Boulé

Bibliographic record

VenueExercise and Sport Sciences Reviews · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdipose Tissue and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetforminPrediabetesMedicineType 2 diabetesDiabetes mellitusPolycystic ovaryDiseaseGlycemicInternal medicinePhysical therapyEndocrinologyInsulin resistance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

If you were to ask people with type 2 diabetes about the benefits of exercise, most would likely say that exercise lowers their blood glucose. If you were to ask them which is the medication of choice for type 2 diabetes, many would say metformin. Indeed, this is reflected in the most recent American Diabetes Association (ADA, 2015) Standards of Clinical Care: “Most patients should begin with lifestyle changes (lifestyle counseling, weight-loss education, exercise, etc.). When lifestyle efforts alone have not achieved or maintained glycemic goals, metformin monotherapy should be added at, or soon after, diagnosis, unless there are contraindications or intolerance. Metformin has a long-standing evidence base for efficacy and safety, is inexpensive, and may reduce risk of cardiovascular events…”(1) Based on these standards (and many others), one could expect that millions of people with diabetes are advised to be physically active while taking metformin. Millions more could be impacted by the potential of coprescribing physical activity and metformin considering that metformin often is prescribed to people with prediabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, children with obesity, and perhaps some cancers in the near future (e.g., there currently are more than 200 clinical trials registered on clinicaltrials.gov on metformin in cancer). Given how frequently exercise and metformin are coprescribed, it is surprising how little we know regarding potential interactions between these therapies. In this issue of Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, Malin and Braun (3) provide a state-of-the-art summary of the emerging research in this area. Many readers may be surprised to learn that several studies have suggested that, compared with either intervention alone, the combination of metformin and exercise often is no better, and sometimes even worse, at improving glycemic control or insulin sensitivity. Research in this area is in its infancy, and interpretation of the literature is challenging because of limitations such as small sample sizes and the rarity of longer-term clinical trials. We also have much to learn about the precise mechanisms by which these treatments can interfere with each other and in which circumstances. Nonetheless, this line of investigation has raised important questions, and the article helps to summarize the current state of knowledge on 1) combining metformin with single bouts of exercise or a few months of exercise training; 2) outcomes such as insulin sensitivity, other cardiovascular disease risk factors; and 3) other outcomes such as fitness, fuel oxidation, and exercise metabolism. The discussion also broadened to include potential interactions between exercise statins or antioxidants, which also are commonly used in our societies. Exercise specialists often are taught to characterize exercise in terms of quantity and quality (2). This article is a good reminder that exercise is not prescribed in isolation and that the context of its prescription may have as much to do with the success than the exercise prescription itself. When thinking of the implications of these findings, the obvious initial questions that people treated with metformin may have are “Should I avoid exercise if I'm taking metformin?” or “Should I avoid metformin if I exercise?” At this time, I would argue that evidence does not clearly support such avoidances. However, it is important to realize how frustrating it may feel for someone with diabetes who observes even slightly more elevated glucose concentrations on the days on which they exercise. Exercise specialists can now reassure participants that such interference between the effects of exercise and metformin has been documented by others. The increased awareness of this occurrence should help fuel the search for strategies to more optimally combine exercise and metformin to maximize glucose lowering and other benefits of these therapeutic cornerstones. Normand G. Boulé Physical Activity and Diabetes Laboratory Faculty of Physical Education & Recreation and Alberta Diabetes Institute University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueExercise and Sport Sciences ReviewsSame topicAdipose Tissue and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207