MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Radical's View of Zionism Today

2013· article· en· W2200044209 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shelly Shreter

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Jewish Quarterly · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicJewish and Middle Eastern Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZionismPolitical radicalismJudaismInterpretation (philosophy)Meaning (existential)ConsciousnessReligious studiesSociologyPhilosophyLawPolitical scienceEpistemologyTheologyPolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The writer of this article, Canadian-born Shelly Shreter, studied at Berkley University, California, and is at present doing post-graduate work at the London School of Economics. His views reflect recent trends among American Jewish students and young people. Partly as a reaction to the anti-Israel stance of the ‘New Left’, these Jewish radicals, without giving up their radicalism, are searching for a synthesis between their Jewish consciousness and social commitment. Some of them, like the present writer, have found that their place is with the Israeli Left in securing a just and progressive society in Israel, not merely by propagating their ideas but by active participation. Others look for a ‘reformed’ Judaism, which leads them to a re-interpretation of the essence of Khassidism and an attempt at giving a new meaning to the idea of ‘Havurot’, a new kind of community living. Others still are trying to define their Jewishness in terms of a new Americanism based on a pluralistic society in which Jews can ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.018
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Jewish QuarterlySame topicJewish and Middle Eastern StudiesFrench-language works237,207