A Study on Pain and Disability Assessment in Migraine Patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Migraine exerts a tremendous toll on the quality of life of affected individuals, their families, and society as a whole. Migraine is associated with considerable disability that undermines normal function and results in reduced productivity. The individual’s burden of disease can be measured in terms of pain by using various scales to find out the effect of drug therapy. The study Protocol was approved by Insitutional Review Board of Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore. Patients were asked to fill the questionnaires of McGill pain assessment scale-short form and Migraine disability assessment scale before and after drug therapy . McGill pain assessment score shows significant difference between before and after the medication in their pain at 1% level (p<0.01). Migraine disability level was compared with before and after medication within the study group by Migraine disability assessment scale (MIDAS). There was a highly significant difference between before and after medication in their disability level at 1% level of significance (p<0.01). Use of the MIDAS is a potentially useful tool enabling headache sufferers to realize the extent of burden of migraine, may improve physician-patient communication about headache-related
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".