MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2200637478 · doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:6495

Influence of Lead on the Germination Process in Zea Mays

2011· article· en· W2200637478 on OpenAlexaff
Lucia Mihălescu, Oana MARE ROŞCA, Monica Marian, Zorica Voșgan, Aurel MAXIM, Mirela Cordea

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca Agriculture · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSeed Germination and Physiology
Canadian institutionsScience North
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGerminationZea maysCaryopsisElongationLead (geology)AgronomyPoaceaeStimulationChemistryBotanyHorticultureBiologyMaterials scienceMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Possible influence of lead on germination was studied, in the carried out experiences. The corn caryopses were soaked in solutions of PbCl2 of different concentrations, for 2 hours. For each variant 30 caryopses were used; they were put into germinators where they were wetted with the corresponding solutions. It was noted that lead, in small quantities, produces the stimulation of germination of about 10-20%, and in high quantities a decrease with 66% due to the inhibition of cells division and cells elongation, too.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca AgricultureSame topicSeed Germination and PhysiologyFrench-language works237,207