Experimental evidence for the influence of charge on the adsorption capacity of carbon dioxide on charged fullerenes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We show, both experimentally and theoretically, that the adsorption of CO2 is sensitive to charge on a capturing model carbonaceous surface. In the experiment we doped superfluid helium droplets with C60 and CO2 and exposed them to ionising free electrons. Both positively and negatively charged C60(CO2)n(+/-) cluster ion distributions are observed using a high-resolution mass spectrometer and they show remarkable and reproducible anomalies in intensities that are strongly dependent on the charge. The highest adsorption capacity is seen with C60(+). Complementary density functional theory calculations and molecular dynamics simulations provided insight into the nature of the interaction of charged C60 with CO2 as well as trends in the packing of C60(+) and C60(-). The quadrupole moment of CO2 itself was found to be decisive in determining the charge dependence of the observed adsorption features. Our findings are expected to be applied for the adsorption of CO2 on charged surfaces in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".