MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2200905381 · doi:10.1139/cjfas-2015-0333

Annual cycle of lipid content and lipid class composition in zooplankton from the Beaufort Sea shelf, Canadian Arctic

2015· article· en· W2200905381 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Tara L. Connelly, Tara N. Businski, Don Deibel, Christopher C. Parrish, Piotr Trela

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCalanusZooplanktonBiologyArcticEcologyCalanus finmarchicusSeasonalityCrustaceanZoologyCopepod

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We determined seasonal cycles of lipid content, lipid class composition, and carbon and nitrogen content of seven taxa of zooplankton that were collected from the Beaufort Sea shelf, Canadian Arctic, over a 10-month period (September 2003 – August 2004). All taxa except the chaetognath Parasagitta elegans had substantial lipids stores (>50%), either seasonally (Oikopleura spp.) or throughout the year (Calanus hyperboreus, Calanus glacialis, Paraeuchaeta glacialis, Metridia longa, and Eukrohnia hamata). Wax esters were the dominant lipid class in the chaetognath Eukrohnia hamata and in all copepods, including the carnivore Paraeuchaeta glacialis. Seasonal trends in lipid content and composition varied among taxa; some taxa had little variation from winter through summer (e.g., Parasagitta elegans), other taxa showed little variation until summer (e.g., Calanus glacialis), and others showed increasing or decreasing trends during winter and spring (e.g., Calanus hyperboreus). Specifically, total lipid content of Calanus hyperboreus decreased from January through May at a rate of ∼450 μg·month−1·individual−1 in adult females and ∼100 μg·month−1·individual−1 in juvenile copepodite IV, representing a 75%–85% loss in lipid.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences→Same topicMarine and fisheries research→French-language works237,207→