Dorsal Column Nuclei Neurons Recorded in a Brain Stem–Spinal Cord Preparation: Characteristics and Their Responses to Dorsal Root Stimulation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recordings were obtained from dorsal column nucleus (DCN) neurons in a neonatal rat brain stem-spinal cord preparation to study their basic electrophysiological properties and responses to stimulation of a dorsal root. Whole-cell patch-clamp recordings were made from 21 neurons that responded to dorsal root stimulation with a fast excitatory postsynaptic potential (EPSP). These neurons were located lateral to, but at the level of, the area postrema at depths of 100-268 microm below the dorsal surface of the brain. The neurons could be divided into groups according to the shape of their action potentials or voltage responses to hyperpolarizing current steps; however, the response profiles of the groups of neurons to dorsal root stimulation were not significantly different and all neurons were considered together. Dorsal root stimulation elicited excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) in all neurons with a very low variability in onset latency and an ability to follow 100-Hz stimulation, indicating that they were mediated by activation of a monosynaptic pathway. The peak amplitude of the EPSP increased with membrane hyperpolarization, and applications of the non-NMDA receptor antagonists 6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo[f]quinoxaline-2, 3-dione (NBQX) and 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) decreased the amplitude of the EPSP to 14.2% of the control response (n = 6). The descending phase of the EPSP decreased with membrane hyperpolarization and was reduced by the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist AP-5 (n = 2). The EPSPs were also reduced in amplitude by applications of the gamma-aminobutyric acid-B (GABA(B)) receptor agonist baclofen, which had no effect on membrane potential or input resistance. These results show that fast EPSPs in DCN neurons elicited by dorsal root stimulation are mediated by an excitatory amino acid acting at both non-NMDA and, to a lesser extent, NMDA receptors. In addition, GABA acting at presynaptic GABA(B) receptors can inhibit these responses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".