Literary Contraband: Indigenous Insurgency and the Spatial Politics of Resistance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El presente artículo sostiene que, más que una instancia de asimilación o adaptación cultural, la (re)emergencia de la literatura indígena en las últimas décadas representa una irrupción o in-surgencia dentro de espacios normalmente, y hasta recientemente, limitados a blancos, mestizos y Occidente. Al conectar estas intervenciones en la ciudad letrada con prácticas de contrabandeo en sociedades fronterizas y rutas pre‐hispánicas de comercio, examino lo que denomino contrabando literario en la poesía de Miguel Ángel López Hernández (Colombia/Venezuela) y en la novela Almanac of the Dead de Leslie Marmon Silko (Estados Unidos). Argumento que conceptualizar la nueva literatura amerindia en estos términos puede contribuir a ilustrar la interacción entre la poética y la política en proyectos contemporáneos de revitalización cultural. Sin embargo, más allá de celebrar la “dichosa llegada” de la literatura amerindia, sugiero que esta incipiente reconfiguración de la ciudad letrada demanda la continua elaboración de acercamientos críticos descolonizantes que atiendan a las dinámicas de poder que marcan la producción y el consumo de la literatura indígena.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.040 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".