Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System ( <scp>PCSAS</scp> )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Psychological Clinical Science Accreditation System ( PCSAS ) was established in 2007 to promote public health by accrediting clinical science Ph.D. programs in university departments of psychology in the United States and Canada. PCSAS ‐accredited training programs are expected to benefit the public by increasing the number of integrative and transdisciplinary clinical scientists who develop and apply new knowledge bearing on the etiology, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology. The history and structure of PCSAS are described, as is its relationship with the Academy of Psychological Clinical Science (the Academy). PCSAS was recognized as an accrediting agency by the Council of Higher Education Accreditation ( CHEA ) in 2012. Through the end of 2013, 21 programs have been accredited. Moving forward, those involved with PCSAS are committed to improving the quality of mental health services by infusing science into all aspects of research, education, and practice activities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.032 | 0.244 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".