MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2201214312 · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107449336.002

Introduction and Scope

2015· book-chapter· en· W2201214312 on OpenAlexaff
Daniel R. Lynch, David A. Greenberg, Ata Bilgili, Jr McGillicuddy, James P. Manning, Alfredo L. Aretxabaleta

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2015
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicInternational Maritime Law Issues
Canadian institutionsBedford Institute of Oceanography
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScope (computer science)Exclusive economic zoneContinental shelfOceanographyGeographyEstuaryFisheryGeologyComputer scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Coastal Ocean The coastal ocean comprises the semi-enclosed seas on the continental shelf, including estuaries and extending to the shelf break. Geographically the scope is approximately that of the Exclusive Economic Zone for which nation-states are responsible. The coastal ocean is the focus of many serious concerns, including coastal inundation by tide, storm, or sea level change; fisheries and aquaculture management; water quality, health, and pollution; harmful algae blooms; facilities siting and planning; ports and harbor development and maintenance; spills and other accidents. All fall within the scope of science, engineering, and development. All demand professional competence in promoting wise and healthy use of this critical region, and in anticipating, monitoring, and responding to events therein. The Virtual Environment Computational Circulation Products . A realistic simulated or virtual environment (herein “the environment”) is becoming available for scientific and engineering use. This takes the form of site-specific computational products for the baseline physical fields. Simulated particles in these fields offer the possibility of high realism, facilitating advanced analysis. Equations and Variables . Well-defined equations and variables characterize the coastal ocean. For our purpose, the bundle of “physical” variables includes pressure, velocity, temperature, salinity, light, nutrients, and subgrid or unresolved mixing rates (typically in the form of turbulent energy, mixing length, a stability parameter, and eddy diffusivity). These all share very conventional formulations for their evolution and transport. This scientific foundation has advanced very far and supports the construction of site-specific environments. Randomness . There will always be unresolved dynamics, and they must be accounted for, both in motion and in biotic development. At the simplest level, there is truncation error, equation error, and forcing uncertainty. These all contribute to a distribution of possibilities for the environment itself. In addition, there is uncertainty about basic biotic rates and their distribution across individuals in the same population. Perhaps most fundamentally, in setting out a gridded calculation and product, the real motion at the subgrid will have at best a statistical description. Particles live in the subgrid, and influences there can only be statistically described.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.757

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2260.108

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicInternational Maritime Law IssuesFrench-language works237,207