MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2201217136 · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1614166

Early Embryonic Expression of Murine Coagulation System Components

2000· article· en· W2201217136 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Wendy Horsfall, Edward M. Conway, Andre C. Schuh

Bibliographic record

VenueThrombosis and Haemostasis · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsHemostasisEmbryonic stem cellFibrinolysisCoagulationCell biologyBiologyCirculatory systemGene expressionGeneImmunologyMedicineGeneticsEndocrinologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of the embryonic coagulation system, and its contribution to the maintenance of vascular integrity during the formation of embryonic blood vessels, remain poorly understood. We have characterized the temporal expression patterns of 27 hemostasis-related genes during murine development. We show that, although most coagulation and fibrinolysis-related factors are expressed coordinately by 7.5 dpc, several, including FIX, FXII and PAI2, are not detectable until later developmental timepoints. The expression of hemostasis-specific genes prior to the formation of a functional circulatory system supports the view that some coagulation factors have additional non-hemostatic functions during development. In addition, the discordant expression of some factors suggests that the embryonic hemostatic system may be distinct from that of the adult. These analyses will help to elucidate the regulation of hemostasis during embryonic/vascular development, and will provide a framework to facilitate the interpretation of gene inactivation studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThrombosis and HaemostasisSame topicBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis MechanismsFrench-language works237,207