Bibliographic record
Abstract
La participation sociale des personnes en situation d’exclusion constitue la finalité principale des politiques sociales adoptées depuis une dizaine d’années en Occident. Au Québec, les centres de santé et de services sociaux (CSSS), en raison de la place centrale qu’ils occupent dans le système public de santé, sont appelés à promouvoir des interventions novatrices, adaptées aux personnes ayant des besoins particuliers et qui s’accordent avec cet objectif. Les CSSS doivent proposer des pratiques d’intervention sollicitant la capacité d’agir de la personne. Pour cela, la subjectivité de la personne, mais aussi son environnement, doit être considérée dans l’évaluation et tout au long du processus d’intervention. Dans le programme Déficience physique (DP), parce qu’elles sont maintenues dans un modèle de compensation des incapacités, les pratiques psychosociales apparaissent incapables de soutenir les personnes-usagères dans l’atteinte d’un objectif de participation sociale. C’est pourquoi il est nécessaire de fournir aux intervenants psychosociaux de première ligne un cadre d’analyse et des outils capables de promouvoir des pratiques allant en ce sens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".