A leitura de livros na escola: um retrato das práticas existentes no ensino básico do Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A leitura de livros no contexto escolar é hoje uma prática corrente – mas quais são as condições nas quais os professores procedem à escolha dos livros e das atividades relacionadas às leituras? Este artigo apresenta um retrato da situação nas escolas do Québec, única província francófona do Canadá. Os dados apresentados provêm de uma vasta enquete realizada junto a mais de seiscentos professores dos últimos ciclos da escola primária (Fundamental I) e dos dois ciclos do ensino secundário (Fundamental II). Como as instruções oficiais do ministério são pouco restritivas, as obras escolhidas variam enormemente de uma escola para outra, o que não permite supor a construção de uma base de cultura comum mediante a leitura das mesmas obras por todos os alunos da província. Enfim, as atividades propostas para as leituras são ainda pouco inovadoras, em particular no ensino secundário.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.013 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".