L’OMC et les risques sanitaires : réflexions autour du rapport de l’organe d’appel dans l’affaire « Hormones II »
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le 16 octobre 2008, l’Organe d’appel de l’OMC a rendu son rapport dans le litige opposant les Etats-Unis et le Canada d’un côté et la Communauté européenne de l’autre, concernant les suites du fameux contentieux sur la viande aux hormones. Si ce rapport ne tranche pas l’affaire au fond, il aborde de front la question du mandat des groupes spéciaux de l’OMC face aux éléments scientifiques contenus dans les litiges dont ils sont saisis : recours aux experts, traitement des informations scientifiques, notion d’incertitude scientifique font l’objet d’une mise au point significative par l’Organe d’appel. A travers une condamnation assez ferme du raisonnement développé en première instance, celui-ci réaffirme par ailleurs le libre choix du niveau de protection approprié pour chacun des Etats parties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".