MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2202035405 · doi:10.5962/p.363922

Alien and invasive native vascular plants along the Norman Wells Pipeline, District of Mackenzie, Northwest Territories

2000· article· en· W2202035405 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
William J. Cody, Kaye L. MacInnes, Jacques Cayouette, S. J. Darbyshire

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Field-Naturalist · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Canadian institutionsAboriginal Affairs Northern Dev CanadaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlienAlien speciesInvasive speciesGeographyPipeline (software)ArchaeologyVascular plantGeologyEcologyBiologyPaleontologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vegetation studies were carried out as part of a research and monitoring program to evaluate project effects and the performance of environmental mitigation along the Norman Wells to Zama Pipeline.This was the first fully buried oil pipeline and the largest and most extensive revegetation program to date in the boreal forest -discontinuous permafrost zone of the Northwest Territories.The pipeline owners (Interprovincial Pipe Line (NW) Ltd. (IPL), now Enbridge Pipelines Inc.) developed a special combination of seeds composed of predominantly native North American species from certified seed stocks to help reduce the risk of introduction of alien (non-North American) species.Monitoring, primarily focussed on the pipeline construction period, confirmed the initial presence of a limited number of alien species.The purpose of this paper is to update floristic data for the Continental Northwest Territories and document invasion of alien plants despite mitigative measures.Of the 34 alien taxa collected along the pipeline right-of-way, 15 are new to the flora of the mainland Northwest Territories including Agrostis stolonifera, Alopecurus arundinaceus, Alopecurus pratensis, Bromus commutatus,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.500
Threshold uncertainty score0.673

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Field-NaturalistSame topicBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesFrench-language works237,207