MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2202282451

Историко-юридическая характеристика Свода законов гражданских в Российской империи 1832 года (гражданская процессуальная сторона)

2012· article· ru· W2202282451 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueУченые записки Орловского государственного университета. Серия: Гуманитарные и социальные науки · 2012
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal and Regulatory Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMajestyLawCivil codeLegislationPolitical scienceEmpireWork (physics)Quarter (Canadian coin)HistoryEngineeringArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the given scientifi c article it is considered results of work of the Second branch of own its imperial majesty of offi ce on ordering of the civil remedial legislation of the Russian empire in the second quarter of a XIX-th century, namely the detailed characteristic of the Code of laws of civil 1832 regarding a civil legal procedure is spent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.013
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.569
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0130.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.008
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.007
Bibliometrics0.0040.013
Science and technology studies0.0110.009
Scholarly communication0.0040.011
Open science0.0100.004
Research integrity0.0070.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0410.031

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it