MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2202511564 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.489

Névralgies pudendales : À propos de trois cas

2013· article· fr· W2202511564 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Imad Ziouziou, Yassine Rhannam, S. Yacoubi, Tarik Karmouni, Khalid El Khader, Abdellatif Koutani, Ahmed Ibn Attiya Andaloussi, Anass Nouri, Philippe Barré, Mohamed Nouri

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPeripheral Nerve Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGynecologyHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les névralgies pudendales, ou syndrome du canal d’Alcock, sont des douleurs périnéales déclenchées par la position assise et dont le diagnostic est clinique. La positivité des blocs anesthésiques confirme ce diagnostic. Cependant, les conduites thérapeutiques restent parfois subjectives. Par l’analyse de trois cas cliniques de patients suivis en consultation d’algologie, nous essayons de distinguer entre les patients qui nécessitent un traitement chirurgical d’emblée, et ceux qui peuvent être mis sous traitement médicamenteux exclusif. Nous découvrons également la valeur du facteur temps dans la prise en charge de cette maladie invalidante.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicPeripheral Nerve DisordersFrench-language works237,207