MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2202636326 · doi:10.1177/002070200806300313

“So, the European Union is 50…”

2008· article· en· W2202636326 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stefan Gänzle, Steffi Retzlaff

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical Systems and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEuropean unionPolitical scienceInternational tradeEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Canadians in particular are in danger of becoming Europhobic the result of hostile media coverage of Europe.... That is mistake, because the EU - portrayed by the media bloated, antidemocratic superstate - has been success story in creating an economically powerful union of 27 countries.1Whether Canadians will become as Europhobic the British is to some extent in the hands of the media, who play vital sociopolitical role. Since reality is partially discursively constructed, it is in essence the media's role to either frame the European Union - and its institutions, activities, and peoples - a bloated, anti-democratic superstate, or instead a success story, suggested by Klaus Hansen, former president of the European parliament. In this article, it is our goal to identify and analyze the linguistic means and strategies used to represent the EU in Canadian print media. We are particularly interested in the ways in which the E U' s 50th anniversary celebrated at time when Germany assumed the helm of the European Union (e.g., the presidency of the EU Council) - was covered by multiple media sources. While coverage of the EU tends to be rather sporadic and only intensifies in times of transatlantic crises (i.e., during the 1995 turbot war or the banning of Canadian seal fur products from European markets), this event provided unique opportunity for the media to report on the EU in broader terms, in ways somewhat detached from day-to-day business. Furthermore, it presented distinctive occasion to contemplate the advantages and disadvantages of the European project.We assume that both the presence and effectiveness of the EU on the world stage are fundamentally dependent on the ways it is recognized and constructed political entity. Media influence the ways expectations are generated vis-a-vis the European Union and its capabilities to deliver tangible results global actor. It has been noted that the existence of public that is shared amongst the citizens of the EU constitutes necessary condition for the democratization of the complex system of EU governance in general.2. The lack thereof is considered to be one of the root causes of the alleged democratic deficit. We argue that media play critical role in both respects - part of the problem and the solution - ultimately depending upon the ways they report E U- related issues. While the importance of an internal EU sphere has been emphasized in the literature, it is interesting to note that academic research has largely ignored the roles assumed by the media in creating the E U' s image abroad. Only very recently have some academics launched research projects to examine the E U' s perception in third countries in general and in Canada in particular.3This article is divided into four parts. The first describes our methodological design, the critical discourse analysis. This is followed by an overview of the history of the relationship between Canada and the EU. Next, we provide an example of discursive analysis of one of the topics that we have identified in our corpus. Selected media representations of the EU's 50th anniversary on 25 March 2007 are examined within the framework of our analysis. This is followed by brief assessment of the representation of the German EU council presidency in Canada's national print media. Finally, the conclusion summarizes the results of our analyses and discusses implications for future research.CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSISCritical discourse analysis has demonstrated rather successfully the many ways in which language use is linked to wider social and cultural processes.4 Scholars of discursive analysis start from assumptions that language and human society are inextricable and that much of the life and experience people share broadly occurs through language. They agree that discourse is practical and social activity reflecting and reproducing culture; it can therefore only be fully understood and analyzed in relation to the situations, institutions, and sociopolitical- s ocio cultural structures that frame particular discursive event. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.596

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisSame topicPolitical Systems and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207