Design of Directivity Patterns with a Unique Null of Maximum Multiplicity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Differential beamforming is one of the most popular beamforming approaches, which has the great potential to form frequency-invariant directivity patterns. In this paper, we study the design of beampatterns with multiple nulls in the same direction, which is clearly different from the design of beampatterns with distinct nulls. Our contributions are as follows. First, we show how to constrain multiple nulls to the same direction and design the desired beampattern with both the traditional and robust approaches. Second, we derive an explicit form of the white noise gain (WNG) of the traditional approach as a function of the frequency, interelement spacing, and null direction, which shows that the cardioid is the optimal beampattern as far as the WNG is concerned. Third, we prove that the WNG improvement of the robust approach rarely depends on the null direction at low frequencies. Finally, considering the fact that the robust differential beamforming approach may produce a frequency-dependent beampattern while improving the WNG, we develop a weighted-norm approach that can make a good compromise between the robustness of differential beamforming with respect to white noise and the frequency-invariant beampattern. The performance of the developed approach is verified by simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".