MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2202889235

La reestructuración del sistema defensivo a finales de la república: los rellenos constructivos de la muralla siglo I a.C. (Cerro de la Concepción, Cartagena)

2013· article· es· W2202889235 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antonio Javier Murcia Muñoz, Elena Ruiz Valderas, Sebastián F. Ramallo Asensio

Bibliographic record

VenueAnales de prehistoria y arqueología · 2013
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicArchaeological and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesQuarter (Canadian coin)ArtGeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

espanolSe aborda el estudio de los materiales procedentes de los rellenos constructivos asociados a un nuevo tramo de cimentacion de la muralla tardo-republicana, documentado en la ladera occidental del cerro de la Concepcion ( Mons Aesculapii ), que en lineas generales nos remiten a unas fechas comprendidas entre mediados y el tercer cuarto del siglo I a.C., datacion que nos introduce directamente en el debate sobre la posible fecha de promocion colonial. EnglishThe study of materials originating from the landfills associated with a new section of foundations of the late-Republican wall, documented on the western slope of Conception Hill ( Mons Aesculapii ), which broadly refer to dates between the middle and third quarter of the first century BC, the dating of which place us squarely in the debate over the possible date of colonial development

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.047

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.028
Scholarly communication0.0080.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnales de prehistoria y arqueologíaSame topicArchaeological and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207