MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2202986146 · doi:10.1152/jn.00490.2001

Temporal Modulation Transfer Functions in Cat Primary Auditory Cortex: Separating Stimulus Effects From Neural Mechanisms

2002· article· en· W2202986146 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurophysiology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAuditory cortexNeuroscienceStimulus (psychology)PsychologyNeural activityCommunicationCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present here a comparison between the local field potentials (LFP) and multiunit (MU) responses, comprising 401 single units, in primary auditory cortex (AI) of 31 cats to periodic click trains, gamma-tone and time-reversed gamma-tone trains, AM noise, AM tones, and frequency-modulated (FM) tones. In a large number of cases, the response to all six stimuli was obtained for the same neurons. We investigate whether cortical neurons are likely to respond to all types of repetitive transients and modulated stimuli and whether a dependence on modulating waveform, or tone or noise carrier, exists. In 97% of the recordings, a temporal modulation transfer function (tMTF) for MU activity was obtained for gamma-tone trains, in 92% for periodic click trains, in 83% for time-reversed gamma-tone trains, in 82% for AM noise, in 71% for FM tones, and only in 53% for AM tones. In 31% of the cases, the units responded to all six stimuli in an envelope-following way. These particular units had significantly larger onset responses to each stimulus compared with all other units. The overall response distribution shows the preference of AI units for stimuli with short rise times such as clicks and gamma tones. It also shows a clear asymmetry in the ability to respond to AM noise and AM tones and points to a strong effect of the frequency content of the carrier on the subcortical processing of AM stimuli. Yet all temporal response properties were independent of characteristic frequency and frequency-tuning curve bandwidth. We show that the observed differences in the tMTFs for different stimuli are to a large extent produced by the different degree of phase locking of the neuronal firings to the envelope of the first stimulus in the train or first modulation period. A normalization procedure, based on these synchronization differences, unified the tMTFs for all stimuli except clicks and allowed the identification of a largely stimulus-invariant, low-pass temporal filter function that most likely reflects the properties of synaptic depression and facilitation. For nonclick stimuli, the low-pass filter has a cutoff frequency of approximately 10 Hz and a slope of approximately 6 dB/octave. For nonclick stimuli, there was a systematic difference between the vector strength for LFPs and MU activity that can likely be attributed to postactivation suppression mechanisms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.905
Threshold uncertainty score0.873

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it