İrritabl barsak sendromlu hastaların aleksitimi, mizaç, karakter özellikleri ve psikiyatrik tanı açısından değerlendirilmesi
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: It is well documented that there is a strong relationship with Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and stress. Indeed IBS is a psychosomatic disease of gastrointestinal system. In this study it is aimed to determine the anxiety and alexithymia levels and their association with temperament, and personality in both patient and healthy control groups. Method: Thirty-four patients with IBS according to Roma II Diagnostic Criteria and 32 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Patients with IBS and the healthy subjects were evaluated by DSM-IV diagnostic criteria, Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI), State and Trait Anxiety Inventory-II (STAI-II) and Toronto Alexithymia Scale-26 (TAS-26) have been applied. Results: Mean age of patients with IBS was 36.41±8.5 and average period of the illness was 6.65±5.8 years. 76.5% of IBS patients had at least one DSM-IV diagnoses. In IBS patient group, mean STAI-II score were signiÞcantly higher than the control group (p=0.001 and p=0.007, respectively). Among TCI subscales harm avoidance (HA) and self-transcendence (ST) mean score were signiÞcantly higher in IBS patient group than healthy controls (p=0.023 and p=0.039, respectively). The result of backward condition logistic regression analysis of total HA and total ST points in the sixth step were found to be a signiÞcant predictors of IBS?s existence (in the sixth step it was found that 2 log likelihood: 80.615 and R2=0.181). Conclusion: With respect to these psychiatric disorders or temperamental and characteristic properties they can have a role in occurrence and exacerbation of IBS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".