MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2203271437 · doi:10.2514/1.j054076

Grid-Generation Algorithms for Complex Glaze-Ice Shapes Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes Simulations

2015· article· en· W2203271437 on OpenAlexafffund
Kazem Hasanzadeh, Éric Laurendeau, Ion Paraschivoiu

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIcing and De-icing Technologies
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMesh generationCurvilinear coordinatesMultigrid methodAlgorithmDiscretizationMathematicsReynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes equationsCurvatureContext (archaeology)Partial differential equationGeometryComputer scienceMathematical analysisComputational fluid dynamicsMechanicsFinite element methodPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents the developments of novel mesh generation algorithms over complex glaze-ice shapes containing multicurvature ice-accretion geometries, such as single/double ice horns. The twofold approaches tackle surface geometry discretization as well as field mesh generation. First, an adaptive curvilinear curvature control algorithm is constructed, solving a one-dimensional elliptic partial differential equation with periodic source terms. This method controls the arc length grid spacing, so that high convex and concave curvature regions around ice horns are appropriately captured, and is shown to effectively treat the grid shock problem. Second, a novel blended method is developed by defining combinations of source terms with two-dimensional elliptic equations. The source terms include two common control functions, Sorenson and Spekreijse, and an additional third source term to improve orthogonality. This blended method is shown to be very effective for improving grid quality metrics for complex glaze-ice meshes with Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes resolution. The performance in terms of residual reduction per nonlinear iteration of several solution algorithms (point–Jacobi, Gauss–Seidel, alternating direction implicit, point, and line Successive Over-Relaxation) are discussed within the context of a full multigrid operator. Details are given on the various formulations used in the linearization process. It is shown that this performance of the solution algorithm depends on the type of control function used. Finally, the algorithms are validated on standard complex experimental ice shapes, demonstrating the applicability of the methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.585

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAIAA JournalSame topicIcing and De-icing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207