MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2203860769 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv660

Right ventricular mass: a rare presentation of cardiac sarcoidosis

2015· article· en· W2203860769 on OpenAlexaff
Mia Bertić, Shruti Tandon, Gerald Wisenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity Research
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiac sarcoidosisPresentation (obstetrics)CardiologySarcoidosisInternal medicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Illustrative images from a patient with a large right ventricular mass secondary to cardiac sarcoidosis primarily involving the right ventricle (RV). A 33-year-old male was referred for assessment after presenting with a 10-day history of dyspnoea on exertion with associated dizziness and was found to be in complete heart block with a ventricular escape rhythm. Endomyocardial biopsy demonstrated non-caseating granulomata suggestive of sarcoidosis. Advanced imaging modalities including 18FDG PET and MRI imaging demonstrated not only the extent of cardiac involvement but additionally, active cardiac and non-cardiac active inflammation. This is the first case to demonstrate an RV tissue mass due to extensive sarcoid involvement with corroborating evidence on 18FDG PET and MRI imaging. Panel A: Transthoracic Echocardiogram with an apical four-chamber view showing marked right ventricular free wall and apical thickening. Panel B: Cardiac MRI (4CH Fiesta gated) demonstrating an ovoid mass-like area of soft tissue thickening involving the mid RV-free wall measuring 5 × 1.7 cm. Panel C: 18FDG PET scan using the cardiac sarcoidosis protocol demonstrating a high degree of uptake within the mass lesion and adjacent right ventricular wall. Left ventricular involvement was most prominent in the interventricular septum with mild FDG uptake within the anterolateral wall. Panel D: Transoesophageal echocardiogram with midoesophageal four-chamber view at 0° (post 6 months of steroid treatment) demonstrating significant lessening in the degree of thickening at RV apex. Funding to pay the Open Access publication charges for this article was provided by Dr Gerald Wisenberg. Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal online.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart JournalSame topicSarcoidosis and Beryllium Toxicity ResearchFrench-language works237,207