MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2204289283

Potential marine moving target indication (MMTI) performance of the RADARSAT constellation mission (RCM)

2012· article· en· W2204289283 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christoph H. Gierull, Ishuwa Sikaneta

Bibliographic record

VenueSynthetic Aperture Radar, 2012. EUSAR. 9th European Conference on · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoving target indicationConstellationComputer scienceFlexibility (engineering)Synthetic aperture radarScheduleRemote sensingReal-time computingSystems engineeringRadarEngineeringComputer visionRadar imagingTelecommunicationsGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent research at DRDC Ottawa shows that Ground MTI (GMTI) is feasible with RCM, providing useful motion information, particularly for ship detection. Proposals to add a hardware switch (as on RADARSAT-2), which would require little engineering effort, have been aborted due to mission schedule impact concerns. Alternative techniques are proposed and theoretically analyzed that use only the programming flexibility of the satellites. These provide somewhat reduced MTI capability compared with the hardware solution, but there are benefits for specific applications where these methods turn out to be superior to the conventional SAR image-based techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSynthetic Aperture Radar, 2012. EUSAR. 9th European Conference onSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207