MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2204549516

Abstract: Geochemistry and regional correlation of Middle Ordovician arc-related volcanic rocks from the Popelogan Inlier (Dunnage Zone), northern New Brunswick

2001· article· en· W2204549516 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
R. A. Wilson

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyGeochemistryBasaltMaficAndesiteVolcanic rockLapilliMantle wedgeIsland arcLileBasaltic andesiteOrdovicianVolcanic arcPartial meltingPyroclastic rockContinental arcScoriaSubductionVolcanoTectonicsPaleontology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Popelogan Inlier consists largely of mafic volcanic rocks of the Goulette Brook Formation, which underlies a thin unit of black chert (Popelogan Formation) containing early Caradocian (N. gracilis zone) graptolites. Four suites of mafic rocks are present, namely ( 1) picritic lapilli tutT, (2) basaltic to andesitic lapilli tuff, (3) low-Cr basalt, and (4) andesitic basalt. Suites (I) and (2) are volumetrically dominant. Suites ( 1) through (4) display incremental increases in absolute traceelement abundances, though all, except the andesitic basalt, are characterized by low HFSE contents. All samples display negative Nb and Ti and positive Th anomalies on traceelement spidergrams, typical of subduction-related basalt, and all plot within volcanic arc fields on tectonic discrimination diagrams. LREE abundances, sloping REE profiles (LaN/YbN = 2.7 to 7.6), and high Zr/Y (2.9-7.7) are typical of calcalkaline basalt and andesite. Trace-element systematics suggest derivation from a mantle source that was enriched in HFSE compared to normal MORB, prior to introduction of Th and LILE via metasomatizing fluids from the subducting slab. Primitive picritic tuff (high MgO, Cr; Mg# 62-81) must have been emplaced following rapid ascent, with minimal fractionation or crustal assimilation. Other chemical variations among the respective suites can be explained by different degrees of partial melting of a common mantle source, followed by variable amounts of fractionation. Volcanic rocks of the Goulette Brook Formation can be stratigraphically correlated with chemically similar arc-related basalts of Arenig-Llanvirn age in northern Maine and Newfoundland. In these areas, calc-alkaline arc volcanic rocks like those of the Goulette Brook Formation are transitional between older primitive arc tholeiite and younger back-arc basalt, and were probably generated during arc rifting. Arc volcanism occurred over an east-dipping subduction zone at the eastern margin of Japetus, and typically involved thinned, peri-Gondwanan continental crust. In New Brunswick, ensialic back-arc volcanism of the Miramichi terrane followed and accompanied rifting of the Popelogan arc. Chemical signatures in the Goulette Brook volcanic rocks similarly reflect the influence of continental crust and/or subcontinental lithosphere in enrichment of the mantle wedge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.265
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeological and Geochemical Analysis→French-language works237,207→