Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estuaries face on a lot of difficulties in its own setting specifically when the environmental management systems are concerned. Analysis on the existing management systems indicated that the fragmented management system is one of major barriers to develop an integrated national estuary policy. In particular, the policy barriers between the development-oriented agencies and the environmental protection agencies, and the conflicts between the Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries seemed so hard to be resolved without the proper national level coordinating mechanism. Moreover, the current estuary management system turned out not to be effective in dealing between the estuary-specific environmental problems and the associated conflicts among stakeholders. Thus, this situation calls for the developments of both national level coordinating mechanisms and site-specific estuary management systems. As a coordinating mechanism, we suggested the establishments of National Estuary Committee in the Prime Minister’s Office on the national-level. Also we proposed a development on the Regional Estuary Management Committee for regional level coordination. In order to support an integrated estuary management, it was also proposed to have a development on the National Estuary Management Plan and on the Estuary Management Implementation Plans. This will cover a widerange of estuary management issues in an integrated perspective. According to the case studies, environmental problems and associated conflicts in the estuary can be managed at the program-level management system which will include the National Estuary Program in USA, Thames Estuary Partnership Program in England and Fraser Estuary Program in Canada. In this respect, we proposed to establish a similar National Estuary Program to solve the facing environmental issues in major estuaries. It could be a few proposed examples the Estuarine Ecosystem Preservation Program in the Han-River Estuary, the Estuarine Circulation Restoration Program in Yongsan-River Estuary and the Salt-water Intrusion Control Program in Sumjin-River Estuary. Four different legalization options were examined to legally support the implementation of the suggested system enhancement, which include the revision and updates on existing laws, enactment of ‘Estuary Management Act’, enactment of ‘Estuary Restoration Act’ with revision of existing laws, and enactment of special laws directly applicable to the individual estuary as like ‘○○ Estuary Management Act’. The second option seems to be favorable because it can fully support the suggested estuarine management system as well as potentially the future management requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".